Mercor AI Safety Fund Grants
Job Description
ABOUT MERCOR
Mercor's mission is to organize human intelligence to power the AI economy. We're a leading AI data company, building the layer between human expertise and frontier models. Millions of domain experts on the platform are paid over $4 million per day to train frontier AI models. Mercor's APEX benchmark family measures AI's real-world impact on professional work. Mercor Enterprise brings this same infrastructure to Fortune 500 companies: helping companies capture how their best people actually work, translating that expertise directly back into agents.
Mercor is creating a new category of work where expertise powers AI advancement. Achieving this requires an ambitious, fast-paced and deeply committed team. You’ll work alongside researchers, operators, and AI companies at the forefront of shaping the systems that are redefining society. Mercor is a profitable Series C company valued at $10 billion. We work in-person five days a week in our San Francisco, NYC, or London offices.
Mercor Safety Research Grants $5M
One of the biggest challenges the industry faces today is addressing whether frontier AI is safe enough to deploy. A model can pass safety checks and still act differently in production. This is why investing today in safety research, evals and verification is critical.
Mercor is committing $5 million to fund safety research. The grant supports:
-
Researcher hours
-
API credits
-
Stipends for event and conference attendance
-
The time of experts from Mercor's platform
This is separate from the Mercor Research Fellowship, which funds benchmark and economics work. You can apply to that HERE https://www.mercor.com/careers/a0a98be0-d856-4129-b500-c0a3e412ef01/.
What we're looking for
We're open to proposals across the full range of safety interests. We're particularly interested in:
-
Misalignment: deceptive alignment, goal misgeneralization, reward hacking, scheming, and situationally-aware failure modes
-
Sandbox escape: containment failures, privilege escalation, tool misuse, and agents operating outside their intended scope
-
Evaluation awareness: models detecting they are being tested and behaving differently under observation than in deployment
-
Interpretability: understanding what models are actually doing internally, and whether that can be made legible to a human reviewer
-
Oversight and control: scalable supervision, human-in-the-loop reliability, and what breaks when the system is more capable than its reviewer
-
Red-teaming methodology: more robust systems for uncovering novel failures
If your work doesn't fit neatly into these, apply anyway. Strong proposals outside this list are welcome.
Why us
-
Funding for researcher time, API credits, and event attendance
-
Where useful to the work: access to Mercor's expert network for human grading, red-teaming, and annotation: lawyers, accountants, engineers, scientists, clinicians
-
Access to Mercor's internal evaluation infrastructure, subject to review
-
Introductions to Mercor's network of researchers across frontier labs and academia
WHO SHOULD APPLY
-
Independent researchers, academics, PhD students, and small teams
-
People with a specific, well-scoped question: the grant is built around your proposal, not a generic research rotation
-
Background in ML, CS, statistics, or an adjacent field (measurement, psychometrics, HCI, security, social science)
-
Bonus: experience with agentic evaluation, RL environments, adversarial ML, or systems security
We expect grantees to publish. A paper, an open dataset, a public methodology, or a tool the field can use.
How to apply
Submit an Expression of Interest. We expect to see a one- or two-page document. It should contain at least a section on your team, background, and research accomplishments; a section on your proposed research project; and a section on the outputs and impact of the project, with directionally correct timelines and resource requirements.
Comments
No comments yet.
Be the first to start the conversation.